The Caterpillar company opposes UCITA, as all consumers of 
software of any variety should.

The full text is available at: http://www.4cite.org/101docs/catopp.html

Excerpts follow:

"
Caterpillar urges other corporate software users to join us in our 
effort of opposing enactment of UCITA by the states.


...UCITA was originally being proposed as a new article to the UCC and
 was formerly referred to as UCC Article 2B (UCC 2B). The effort to
 pass this uniform computer law act as a new article to the UCC failed
 however because of a controversy raised over the proposed act's
 unbalance and lack of fairness to software users...

...the drafting committee meetings was dominated in large part by 
mass-market software publishers (i.e., Microsoft) that showed no 
interest in substantive balance of the act for users...

Some of the problems are as follows:

    Software publishers can shut down user software remotely
    without court approval ...

    Unlimited disclaimers of warranty will absolve publishers from
    damages for defective software even when the publisher
    concealed defects that might harm the business ...

    Software acquired by employees without authorization will end
    up binding a corporation 

    Click through terms in the software will overwrite those of a fully
    negotiated contract between the software publisher and the
    corporation and 

    Allows publishers to write their own intellectual property law and
    circumvent well established intellectual property principles and
    statutes 

"